Mapping Early American Elections


Maryland House of Delegates, 1817

In 1817, Maryland elected eighty representatives to the state’s House of Delegates. At least nine of them were Federalists, and at least twenty of them were Democratic-Republicans.

The map for this election is incomplete due to the lack of returns at the county level.

Members of Maryland’s House of Delegates were chosen through popular elections. Each of Maryland’s nineteen counties elected four members using a county-level at-large method. Annapolis and the City of Baltimore each elected two members.

Maryland had three legislative bodies: The House of Delegates, which was elected annually in October and had eighty members; a State Senate, comprised of fifteen members, chosen every five years in early September; and a Governor’s Council made up of five members chosen yearly by the Legislature.

District Candidate Party Vote Percentage Elected
Annapolis City Dennis Claude Democratic-Republican 126 36%
Annapolis City John Stephen Democratic-Republican 123 35.1%
Annapolis City Alexander C. Magruder Federalist 101 28.9%
Baltimore Abraham Price Democratic-Republican 1,031 27.4%
Baltimore Adam Showers Democratic-Republican 1,007 26.7%
Baltimore John B. Snowden Democratic-Republican 1,005 26.7%
Baltimore Thomas Johnson Democratic-Republican 722 19.2%
Baltimore City Edward G. Woodyear Democratic-Republican unopposed
Baltimore City Thomas Kell Democratic-Republican unopposed
Calvert Benjamin Gray Federalist 299 13.9%
Calvert Gustavus Weems Federalist 299 13.9%
Calvert Richard Grahame Federalist 295 13.7%
Calvert Samuel Turner Federalist 283 13.2%
Calvert Sutton J. Weems Democratic-Republican 253 11.8%
Calvert Levin Lawrence Democratic-Republican 245 11.4%
Calvert Isaac Rawlings Democratic-Republican 240 11.2%
Calvert W. L. Weems Democratic-Republican 234 10.9%
Caroline Frederick Holbrook Democratic-Republican 640 13.7%
Caroline Nathan Whitby Democratic-Republican 615 13.2%
Caroline Thomas Saulsbury Democratic-Republican 608 13.1%
Caroline William Whiteley Democratic-Republican 607 13%
Caroline Richard Hughlett Federalist 560 12%
Caroline Edward Pendleton Federalist 553 11.9%
Caroline Samuel Talbot Federalist 547 11.7%
Caroline Elijah Satterfield Federalist 527 11.3%
Cecil Philip Thomas Federalist 656 28.1%
Cecil James Beard Federalist 549 23.5%
Cecil Levi Tyson Federalist 542 23.2%
Cecil Matthew Pearce Federalist 540 23.1%
Dorchester Benjamin Lecompte 554 22.6%
Dorchester Henry Keene 510 20.9%
Dorchester Edward Griffith 506 20.7%
Dorchester Thomas Pitt 496 20.3%
Dorchester Michael Lucas 377 15.4%
Frederick Thomas Hawkins Democratic-Republican 2,231 13.1%
Frederick Benjamin S. Pigman Democratic-Republican 2,206 13%
Frederick William Downey Democratic-Republican 2,204 13%
Frederick George Buckley Federalist 2,090 12.3%
Frederick Henry Stembel Democratic-Republican 2,087 12.3%
Frederick Baker Johnson Federalist 2,077 12.2%
Frederick Frederick A. Schley Federalist 2,055 12.1%
Frederick Jacob Baumgardner Federalist 2,046 12%
Harford Samuel Bradford 816 22.9%
Harford Charles S. Sewall 806 22.6%
Harford James Steele 707 19.8%
Harford James G. Davis 645 18.1%
Harford Alexander Norris 580 16.3%
Kent William Knight 488 18.8%
Kent Thomas B. Hynson 487 18.8%
Kent John B. Eccleston 482 18.6%
Kent George Neal 475 18.3%
Kent Thomas Whittington 356 13.7%
Kent Thomas Wilson 167 6.4%
Somerset Thomas K. Carroll 424 23%
Somerset Henry K. Long 396 21.4%
Somerset James Murray 388 21%
Somerset Hampden Haynie 362 19.6%
Somerset Levin R. King 269 14.6%
Talbot Daniel Martin Democratic-Republican 645 13.4%
Talbot Samuel Stevens, Jr. Democratic-Republican 635 13.1%
Talbot James Nabb Democratic-Republican 609 12.6%
Talbot Samuel Tenant Democratic-Republican 602 12.5%
Talbot Jabez Caldwell Federalist 599 12.4%
Talbot Robert Banning Federalist 586 12.1%
Talbot Arthur Holt Federalist 585 12.1%
Talbot John L. Elbert Federalist 568 11.8%

In most cases, only candidates who received more than 5 percent of the vote in a district are reported. Other candidates are reported as a group, but only if they in aggregate received more than 5 percent of the vote. In addition, percentages for each district may not add up to 100 percent due to rounding. The term Dissenting Republican includes various breakaway factions of the Democratic-Republican party.

New Nation Votes Data


Mapping Early American Elections is generously funded by the National Endowment for the Humanities and developed by the Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media at George Mason University.

Creative Commons License This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

RRCHNM logo NEH logo