Massachusetts elected eleven Federalists and three Democratic-Republicans to the Fourth Congress.
Although Massachusetts used the district system for electing members to Congress, state law required that candidates receive a majority of votes in order to win. As a result, four districts required multiple ballots to elect their members in elections November 1794 through April 1795:
Massachusetts held a special election, which went to two ballots, in which Thompson Skinner was elected to replace Theodore Sedgwick, who resigned to serve in the US Senate.
Massachusetts held a special election, which went to two ballots, in which Samuel Sewall was elected to replace Benjamin Goodhue, who resigned to serve in the US Senate.
District | Candidate | Party | Vote | Percentage | Elected |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Theodore Sedgwick | Federalist | 731 | 52.1% | ✓ |
1 | Tompson J. Skinner | Democratic-Republican | 639 | 45.5% | |
2 | William Lyman | Democratic-Republican | 774 | 50.8% | ✓ |
2 | William Shepard | Federalist | 713 | 46.8% | |
3 | Samuel Lyman | Federalist | 677 | 56.3% | ✓ |
3 | Daniel Bigelow | Democratic-Republican | 357 | 29.7% | |
3 | Other candidates | 103 | 8.6% | ||
3 | Ebenezer Mattoon, Jr. | Federalist | 66 | 5.5% | |
4 | Dwight Foster | Federalist | 634 | 51.5% | ✓ |
4 | Levi Lincoln | Democratic-Republican | 575 | 46.7% | |
5 | Nathaniel Freeman, Jr. | Federalist | 1,034 | 68.4% | ✓ |
5 | Peleg Coffin, Jr. | Democratic-Republican | 475 | 31.4% | |
6 | John Reed | Federalist | 650 | 64.6% | ✓ |
6 | George Partridge | Democratic-Republican | 222 | 22.1% | |
6 | John Davis | 88 | 8.7% | ||
7 | George Leonard | Federalist | 606 | 70.5% | ✓ |
7 | Elisha May | Federalist | 131 | 15.3% | |
7 | Other candidates | 65 | 7.4% | ||
7 | Phanuel Bishop | Democratic-Republican | 57 | 6.6% | |
8 | Fisher Ames | Federalist | 2,178 | 56.5% | ✓ |
8 | Charles Jarvis | Democratic-Republican | 1,668 | 43.2% | |
9 | Joseph B. Varnum | Democratic-Republican | 1,509 | 50.4% | ✓ |
9 | Samuel Dexter, Jr. | Federalist | 1,429 | 47.7% | |
10 | Benjamin Goodhue | Federalist | 367 | 52.6% | ✓ |
10 | Samuel Holten | Federalist | 171 | 24.5% | |
10 | Loammi Baldwin | Federalist | 92 | 13.2% | |
10 | Other candidates | 68 | 9.6% | ||
11 | Theophilus Bradbury | Federalist | 753 | 90% | ✓ |
11 | Other candidates | 84 | 10% | ||
12 | Henry Dearborn | Democratic-Republican | 464 | 51.2% | ✓ |
12 | Jonathan Bowman | Federalist | 260 | 28.7% | |
12 | Other candidates | 81 | 8.9% | ||
12 | Daniel Coney | Federalist | 51 | 5.6% | |
12 | Isaac Parker | Federalist | 50 | 5.5% | |
13 | Peleg Wadsworth | Federalist | 607 | 52% | ✓ |
13 | William Wedgery | Democratic-Republican | 399 | 34.2% | |
13 | Other candidates | 92 | 7.9% | ||
13 | William Martin | 69 | 5.9% | ||
14 | George Thacher | Federalist | 307 | 68.4% | ✓ |
14 | Nathaniel Wells | Federalist | 92 | 20.5% | |
14 | Joseph Tucker | 29 | 6.5% |
In most cases, only candidates who received more than 5 percent of the vote in a district are reported. Other candidates are reported as a group, but only if they in aggregate received more than 5 percent of the vote. In addition, percentages for each district may not add up to 100 percent due to rounding. The term Dissenting Republican includes various breakaway factions of the Democratic-Republican party.
Mapping Early American Elections is generously funded by the National Endowment for the Humanities and developed by the Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media at George Mason University.
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.